Final answer:
The effectiveness of the Socratic method in maintaining humility about knowledge depends on the individual's personality and approach to the technique. It can encourage self-examination and openness for those who are humble and open, while for those prone to arrogance, it might not serve the intended humble purpose.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Socratic method is a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presumptions. It is named after the classical Greek philosopher Socrates and is a technique often used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy and law.
Option (c), "It depends on the individual's personality," might be the most accurate answer. The Socratic method can indeed encourage self-examination and openness when individuals are willing to acknowledge their lack of knowledge and are open to learning. For those who are humble and eager to question their beliefs, it aids in maintaining humility about knowledge. However, if individuals are prone to intellectual arrogance, they might use the Socratic method in a way that amplifies their ego rather than promoting genuine inquiry.
As a discussion technique, the Socratic method's effectiveness in maintaining humility about knowledge depends much on the context in which it is used and the intentions and attitudes of those participating. With self-awareness and respect for the dialogue, it can be a powerful tool for collaborative discovery and maintaining a humble approach to knowledge.