Final answer:
Executive enforcement is not a typical method to enforce an arbitrator’s decision; this process is usually carried out through judicial enforcement, contractual obligations, or voluntary compliance by the parties involved.
Step-by-step explanation:
All of the following are methods to enforce an arbitrator’s decision except:
- Judicial enforcement
- Executive enforcement
- Contractual enforcement
- Voluntary compliance
Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution in which parties agree to be bound by the decision of a neutral third-party, the arbitrator. Enforcement of an arbitrator's decision can occur through various mechanisms. Judicial enforcement refers to the court system’s role in confirming and enforcing arbitration awards. Contractual enforcement means the parties are agreeing by contract to abide by the arbitrator's decision. Voluntary compliance occurs when the parties comply with the decision without the need for external enforcement.
The incorrect option is Executive enforcement. Executive enforcement would involve actions by a president or governor, such as issuing executive orders, which is not a typical method for enforcing arbitrator decisions. Hence, the answer to the question is Executive enforcement (b).