24.8k views
3 votes
Which of the following cases was NOT one of the Supreme Court’s "software-eligibility trilogy" of cases?

1. Gottschalk v. Benson
2. Williams & Wilkins v. United States
3. Parker v. Flook
4. Diamond v. Diehr

a) Gottschalk v. Benson
b) Williams & Wilkins v. United States
c) Parker v. Flook
d) Diamond v. Diehr

User Balanivash
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The case that was not part of the Supreme Court's 'software-eligibility trilogy' is Williams & Wilkins v. United States.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct option is 2. Williams & Wilkins v. United States. This case was not one of the Supreme Court's 'software-eligibility trilogy' of cases.

The 'software-eligibility trilogy' refers to three landmark Supreme Court cases that established the eligibility criteria for software patents. The cases in this trilogy are:

  1. Gottschalk v. Benson
  2. Parker v. Flook
  3. Diamond v. Diehr

Each of these cases contributed to the development of the legal framework for determining whether a particular software invention is eligible for patent protection.

User Sagar Rawal
by
9.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.