Final answer:
Workplace drug testing is not completely prohibited in any state; it is regulated by both state and federal laws, with some variation between states. Cases like Employment Division v. Smith show enforcement of workplace drug policies despite religious claims, while historical exercises about voting rights and legal personhood indicate the legal developments over time.
Step-by-step explanation:
While there are regulations and limitations, workplace drug testing is not completely prohibited in any state. For instance, the case of Employment Division v. Smith dealt with the issue of drug use for religious reasons versus workplace regulations, illustrating a scenario where drug policies were enforced despite religious claims. Similarly, historical exercises indicate that questions related to rights, such as the right to vote during the Revolutionary Era or the legal personhood of women prior to the 19th Amendment, reflect significant legal evolutions over time. The necessary and proper clause, mentioned in one exercise, has been interpreted by the courts to often expand the power of the national government, rather than limit it, contrary to what the exercise statement might suggest.
Workplace drug testing policies vary state by state and are subject to federal laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act, which works to prevent discrimination, including against those with disabilities, but not to entirely prohibit drug testing. Some states may have stricter or more lenient approaches to drug testing, but there are no blanket prohibitions.