Final answer:
The theory of rational ignorance suggests that some voters choose to remain uninformed and not vote. The question of whether it is a good idea to encourage greater voter turnout is subjective. It depends on one's perspective, as higher turnout can enhance democracy (option a) but uninformed voting can be detrimental (option b).
Step-by-step explanation:
The theory of rational ignorance posits that voters may choose to remain uninformed about issues and not vote because they recognize that their single vote is unlikely to influence the outcome of an election. Given this, the question of whether it is necessarily a good idea to encourage greater voter turnout arises. The answer is subjective and depends on one's perspective.
Option A: Yes, as higher turnout enhances democracy: Advocates for higher voter turnout argue that it leads to a more representative democracy, as it includes a wider range of perspectives and interests. They believe that greater participation strengthens democratic principles and outcomes.
Option B: No, as uninformed voting can be detrimental: Critics argue that encouraging greater voter turnout without addressing the issue of voter education may lead to uninformed voting. Uninformed voters may make decisions based on biases, emotions, or misinformation, which can have negative consequences for the electoral process and policymaking. They advocate for a focus on voter education rather than simply increasing turnout.
Ultimately, the decision on whether to encourage greater voter turnout should be based on a balanced consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks, and an understanding of the specific context and challenges of a given electoral system.