197k views
3 votes
Retained earnings may be restricted or appropriated. Explain the difference between the two and give an example of when each may be used.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Retained earnings can be restricted for legal or contractual obligations or appropriated for internal purposes such as financing an expansion or R&D project. A restriction is an externally imposed limitation, while an appropriation is an internally decided designation of funds.

Step-by-step explanation:

Retained earnings are profits that a company keeps in the business after dividends are paid out to shareholders. These earnings may be either restricted or appropriated. A company restricts retained earnings by setting aside funds for a specific legal requirement or a contractual obligation. For example, if a company is legally required to maintain a certain level of cash reserve due to regulation or loan agreement, it would restrict the relevant amount from its retained earnings.



Alternatively, a company appropriates retained earnings as a way of earmarking funds for a particular internal purpose, which is driven by the company's management or board. An example of this could be when a company plans to finance an expansion project or research and development initiative internally without raising additional capital externally. In such a case, an appropriation of retained earnings would be made to indicate that a certain amount of the company's earnings is set aside for this project.

User FlashMark
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.