Question

When faced with the tension between Absolutism, which proposes a single set of objective absolute truths, and Relativism, which suggests truths are subjective and context-dependent, how does intersubjectivity resolve this philosophical dilemma?

a) Intersubjectivity supports Absolutism by emphasizing universally valid truths.
b) Intersubjectivity supports Relativism by emphasizing subjective interpretations.
c) Intersubjectivity reconciles the tension by proposing truths grounded in shared perspectives and agreement between individuals.
d) Intersubjectivity perpetuates the tension between Absolutism and Relativism without offering a resolution.

Answer 1

Intersubjectivity resolves the tension between Absolutism and Relativism by proposing truths grounded in shared perspectives and agreement between individuals.

Step-by-step explanation:

Intersubjectivity resolves the philosophical dilemma between Absolutism and Relativism by proposing truths grounded in shared perspectives and agreement between individuals. It suggests that while there may not be a single set of objective absolute truths, there can be truths that are valid and universally accepted within a specific context and agreed-upon by a community or society.