Final answer:
The best answer is d. All of the above are justification defenses: Youth, consent, and entrapment can all be considered justification defenses in criminal law where the defendant admits to committing the act but argues that it was justified under the circumstances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The best answer is d. All of the above are justification defenses.
A justification defense is a defense in criminal law where the defendant admits to committing the act in question but argues that it was justified under the circumstances. Let's briefly explain each of the options:
- Youth: Youth is considered a justification defense in cases where the defendant is a minor and claims that their actions were reasonable considering their age and level of maturity.
- Consent: Consent can be a justification defense in cases where the defendant claims that the alleged victim gave voluntary and informed consent for the act in question.
- Entrapment: Entrapment can be a justification defense in cases where the defendant argues that they were induced or coerced by law enforcement to commit the crime.
Therefore, all of the options given, including youth, consent, and entrapment, can be considered justification defenses.