Final answer:
In organizational justice, distributive justice refers to the fairness of the outcomes individuals receive, dealing with the moral principles that guide how society distributes wealth, goods, and services. Philosophers like John Rawls have contributed theories on how to achieve a just distribution, which also intersects with the broader concept of social justice.
Step-by-step explanation:
In organizational justice, distributive justice concerns the fairness of the outcomes individuals receive. It is part of a broader concept that examines how wealth, goods, and services are distributed within a society. The core question of distributive justice revolves around whether a just society is one that provides for its members based on need or one that focuses on personal freedom, potentially leading to significant disparities in wealth and well-being.
Distributive justice preserves the idea that everyone should have fair access to resources, which often involves balancing different needs and entitlements. Theories of distributive justice, such as those proposed by philosophers like John Rawls, discuss principles designed to achieve fairness. Rawls, for instance, is known for his principle of ensuring justice if individuals are entitled to the holdings they possess under a society's distribution rules.
The concept of distributive justice also extends to the debate on the role of government in regulating the market and ensuring needs are met, particularly for disadvantaged members of society. When discussing distributive justice within political ideologies, we also touch upon the notion of social justice, which aims for the equitable distribution of opportunities, resources, and rights.