Question

The War Powers Resolution may be considered unconstitutional because

a) It grants too much power to Congress
b) It limits the president's ability to respond to emergencies
c) It lacks specificity in defining hostilities
d) It is redundant with existing laws

Answer 1

The War Powers Resolution may be considered unconstitutional because it grants too much power to Congress, limits the president's ability to respond to emergencies, lacks specificity in defining hostilities, and is redundant with existing laws.

Step-by-step explanation:

The War Powers Resolution of 1973, also known as the War Powers Act, may be considered unconstitutional for several reasons:

1. It grants too much power to Congress: The resolution requires that the president seek congressional approval to continue any military campaign beyond sixty days, which some argue gives Congress too much control over the president's war-making powers.
2. It limits the president's ability to respond to emergencies: Critics argue that the requirement to seek congressional approval within sixty days may hinder the president's ability to respond swiftly to national security threats.
3. It lacks specificity in defining hostilities: The resolution does not clearly define what constitutes hostilities, leaving it open to interpretation and potential abuse.
4. It is redundant with existing laws: Some argue that the resolution is unnecessary since the Constitution already grants Congress the power to declare war and oversee the military.

Overall, these criticisms raise concerns about the constitutionality and effectiveness of the War Powers Resolution.