Final answer:
The claim that the Oklahoma deer harvest in 2006 was more than 200 times the 1946 deer harvest is likely false, as such an increase seems improbable without specific data or context, considering modern sustainable wildlife management practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the official Oklahoma deer harvest in 2006 was more than 200 times the 1946 deer harvest is likely false. Generally, over the decades, wildlife management practices have become more sophisticated, aiming for sustainable hunting levels. Hunters today sustainably harvest over 700,000 wild white-tailed deer annually on a national scale. However, a 200-fold increase in the deer harvest over a 60-year period in Oklahoma seems unlikely without more context or data supporting such a claim.
Deer population management is a complex issue, incorporating various factors like habitat conditions, hunting regulations, and environmental changes. If deer populations were substantially lower in 1946, possibly due to overhunting or habitat loss, even considerable increases in population and harvested deer might not reach the level of being 200 times higher in 2006.