117k views
5 votes
All children live in a democracy. Randi is a child. Randi deserves democratic rights. Although this is true, wh

reasoning is it?
O the fallacy of ethos in Randi's citizenship
O the fallacy of pathos about democracies
O the fallacy of logos in deductive reasoning
O the fallacy of logos In Inductive reasoning

User Tronic
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The reasoning behind the statement “All children live in a democracy. Randi is a child. Randi deserves democratic rights” is based on the principle that democracy is a morally legitimate form of government that produces better consequences for people than any feasible alternative mode of governance.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reasoning behind the statement “All children live in a democracy. Randi is a child. Randi deserves democratic rights” is based on the principle that democracy is a morally legitimate form of government that produces better consequences for people than any feasible alternative mode of governance.

American philosopher Richard Arneson argues that democracies outperform extant rival systems and that democratic nations tend to be the wealthiest in the world because positions of power are determined through elections, making leaders more likely to meet the needs of the population. Additionally, the view that human worth and value are derived from our rational nature supports the idea that all humans, including children, have rights and deserve democratic participation.

User Cyrill
by
7.5k points