Final answer:
A reflecting telescope typically has a larger primary mirror compared to its secondary mirror, to capture more light. Hence, a reflecting telescope with a secondary mirror larger than the primary does not make sense and is not in line with conventional designs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of a reflecting telescope with a secondary mirror larger than the primary mirror does not align with conventional telescope designs. In a typical reflecting telescope, the primary mirror is the main optical component and is larger than the secondary mirror. The job of the secondary mirror is to reflect the collected light into a more accessible focal plane for viewing or recording. The primary mirror thus gathers light and the secondary mirror, which is smaller, directs this light to an eyepiece or camera. An example of conventional reflecting telescope design is the Gemini North telescope, with an 8-meter diameter primary mirror and a 1-meter diameter secondary mirror.
Given this design expectation, the answer to the question 'Does it make sense to have a reflecting telescope in which the secondary mirror is bigger than the primary mirror?' is most likely 'b. No', because it does not follow the conventional design of reflecting telescopes where the primary mirror is larger to capture more light.