Final answer:
No, evidence derived indirectly from an illegal search is not known as direct evidence. It is considered as indirect evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, evidence derived indirectly from an illegal search is not known as direct evidence. In fact, evidence obtained through an illegal search is generally considered to be indirect evidence. Direct evidence refers to evidence that directly proves a fact, such as an eyewitness account or a video recording of a crime. Indirect evidence, on the other hand, is evidence that requires inference or interpretation to establish a fact. Therefore, evidence derived indirectly from an illegal search would fall under the category of indirect evidence.