Final answer:
The patient's malpractice lawsuit against the nurse for injuries sustained during CPR is likely to fail due to the emergency nature of the situation and the Good Samaritan laws protecting emergency aid providers. The intent and execution of CPR in this context align with medical best practices aimed at saving lives, reducing the merits of the lawsuit.
Step-by-step explanation:
The patient's lawsuit against the nurse for malpractice is likely to be thrown out of court for several reasons. When CPR is performed in an emergency, it is recognized that certain injuries, such as broken ribs, can occur as a result of the force required for effective chest compressions. Moreover, healthcare providers are often protected by Good Samaritan laws that provide legal immunity in situations where they render emergency care in good faith and without gross negligence. Proper CPR training emphasizes this as a possibility but also teaches the technique to minimize the risk of injury while providing the necessary force to maintain blood flow to vital organs, such as the brain.
Since CPR is intended to be a lifesaving procedure, and the nurse performed it in a public place to aid an individual in immediate distress, the court would recognize the life-saving intent and necessity of the action. If the nurse acted according to accepted medical practices and without malice or gross negligence, the attempt to sue for malpractice would not hold up, especially considering the urgency and beneficial outcome of the situation.