Final answer:
The research finding that 'Brain activity associated with making a decision is evident before consciousness is aware of it' is inconsistent with the notion of free will, suggesting that decisions may be determined by unconscious processes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question addresses the concept of free will in relation to neuroscience and psychology findings. When considering which research finding is inconsistent with the notion of free will, the most relevant point is 'd. Brain activity associated with making a decision appears to be evident well before consciousness is aware of it.' This finding suggests that free will may be an illusion if our decisions are determined by unconscious brain processes before we are even aware of making a choice. Benjamin Libet's experiments have provided evidence supporting this view by demonstrating that neurological bases for decision-making precede our conscious awareness of these decisions. This challenges the intuitive belief that we consciously will our actions and decisions in a cause-and-effect manner.
The 'Easy Problem of Consciousness' (a), 'Exogenous attention can be mapped in the brain' (b), and 'Chimps have been shown to have a theory of mind' (c) do not directly challenge the concept of free will as option 'd' does. Rather, they examine different aspects of cognitive function that do not necessarily imply predetermined actions that bypass conscious deliberation.