Final answer:
Kingship historically represents a fusion of human and divine qualities, where the idealized nature of rulership is tempered by the reality of human imperfection. This is evident in ancient Egypt, philosophical musings, and artistic depictions, where the struggle between ideal and reality is portrayed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The historical portrayal of kings involves a complex blend of divinity and humanity, with a focus on the ideal yet acknowledging the inherent human flaws. Models of the ideal king were not just rulers, but also intermediaries between the earthly and the divine.
In ancient Egypt, the king was seen as a human embodiment of the divine will, linked with deities like Horus, symbolizing both eternal kingship and the individual's spirit or ka.
Reflecting on the concept of kingship across cultures and periods, we see these rulers portrayed in the arts and literature as a mix of mortal errors and divine rights. From the thoughtful deliberations in Plato's writings on the philosopher-king to the dramatized iterations in Shakespeare's plays of a troubled monarchy, kingship encapsulates the struggle between perfect ideals and flawed realities.
Even the most esteemed emperors and pharaohs were seen as human beings with personal features, exemplified in artworks such as Menkaure and his queen, where a sense of individuality shines through royal formality. According to Louis Marin's view, a king's image plays a crucial role in establishing their authority.