Final answer:
The development of jewelry signified abstract, symbolic thinking and was closely tied to trade, societal status, and the representation of social and religious roles. It indicated complex social hierarchies and trade networks, with artifacts made from exotic materials being particularly prized. Jewelry also reflected the wealth, prestige, and changing values within these ancient and historical societies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The development of jewelry was a critical step in societal development, particularly as it indicated the existence of abstract, symbolic thinking. Jewelry in ancient societies often involved materials that were exotic and hard to obtain, indicating trade and societal structures that supported artisans. For instance, Jomon people made earrings and pendants and traded items like shell bracelets and obsidian. On the other hand, Viking society used jewelry to indicate social status, with women and men of higher status wearing more elaborate pieces. Jewelry in the tombs of royal women in certain societies, like those of ancient Egypt, often represented connections to deities, signifying the role of royal women as mortal representatives. Similarly, the artisans in the Kingdoms of Mesoamerica made extravagant gold ornaments signifying professional and social status.
Throughout history, the function of jewelry has crossed into areas such as agriculture, as in the case of bronze bells in Yayoi culture, possibly used in rituals, and European trade goods, including jewelry, found in the graves of Native Americans, which escalated with the arrival of European settlers. The materials and quality of jewelry also reflected the rank and prestige of leaders, such as African chiefs, showing that art and jewelry were significant indicators of status. As societies evolved past subsistence living, aesthetic items like jewelry began to hold value beyond their immediate utility, indicating a societal shift toward more complex social structures and values.