Final answer:
The article would not be useful under a subheading involving refutation of counterclaims or balance, as it lacks a realistic counterclaim, fair appeal, coherence, and appropriate evidence for supporting an argumentative essay on recycling.
Step-by-step explanation:
You are writing an argumentative essay on the benefits of recycling and are evaluating an article as a potential source. When deciding how to use the resources in relation to your thesis or argument, it's vital to assess the organization and substance of your chosen article.
However, this particular article would not be helpful under the subheading related to refuting counterclaims or presenting a balanced view. The reason for this is that the article does not identify and refute a realistic counterclaim, nor does it show any awareness of fairness or an ability to appeal to readers' logic and emotions.
The lack of structure and coherent argument, as well as insufficient use of transitions and unclear paragraph topics, further contribute to the article's inapplicability for your purpose. Additionally, the text demonstrates inadequate attention to answering major questions or providing complete evidence, which is crucial in constructing a persuasive argumentative essay on the topic of recycling.
When looking for sources to support your argumentative essay, search for ones that provide credible researched evidence, clarify their position on the issue, effectively use headings and subheadings for organization, and include appropriate transitions that link ideas clearly and coherently.