The best statement to describe Annabelle's claim is: C. Annabelle's claim is correct since a scale factor of 1/2 results in a line segment half as long as the original.
Here's a breakdown of why this is the case:
Scale factor in dilations determines how much the image is enlarged or shrunk compared to the original figure. A scale factor of 1 would mean no change in size, a scale factor greater than 1 would enlarge the image, and a scale factor between 0 and 1 would shrink the image.
In this problem, the new line segment is half as long as the original, meaning it has been shrunk.
The only scale factor among the options that would result in a shrunken image is 1/2. A scale factor of 2 would double the size, and the other options are not relevant to shrinking the image.
Therefore, Annabelle's claim that the scale factor must have been 1/2 is correct.
Scale factor is a multiplier that affects the size of the image.
Scale factors less than 1 shrink the image, while those greater than 1 enlarge it.
A scale factor of 1/2 specifically reduces the size by half.
Question: