Final answer:
a. Six weeks of paid leave for women upon the birth of a child would not be a violation of Title VII. b. A strength test for a city fire department that has excluded all female applicants would likely be a violation of Title VII. c. Paying female MBA hires a higher starting salary compared to male MBA hires would likely be a violation of Title VII.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. According to the information provided, providing six weeks of paid leave for women upon the birth of a child would not be a violation of Title VII. This is because it is considered a provision specifically designed to protect women in the workplace. Many states have laws granting time off for pregnancy and child care, which can benefit female employees and recognize the domestic responsibilities of women who work part-time.
b. A strength test for a city fire department that has excluded all female applicants would likely be a violation of Title VII. This is because it constitutes gender discrimination by excluding women from applying based on their gender. Title VII prohibits discrimination against women in the workplace, including during the hiring process.
c. Paying female MBA hires a starting salary of $81,000 while paying male MBA hires only $75,000 would also likely be a violation of Title VII. This is because it constitutes gender-based pay discrimination, where women are being paid less than men for the same job. The Equal Pay Act requires equal pay for men and women in the same workplace performing equal work.