199k views
4 votes
As an author, you are always making choices about how you are going to present your argument. Every word you write is a choice in how you are going to communicate to your reader.

Bryson uses the word ‘slaves’ in her thesis, then she uses the definition pattern in her introduction to redefine this term more specifically, such as to 'servants'. Was she successful? Why or why not?

User MNU
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Bryson's success in redefining the term 'slaves' in her thesis depends on the effectiveness of the new definition in conveying her argument to the reader.

Step-by-step explanation:

Bryson uses the word 'slaves' in her thesis, and then she redefines this term more specifically in her introduction using the definition pattern, such as to 'servants'. Whether or not she was successful depends on the effectiveness of her redefinition in conveying her argument to the reader. In other words, was the new definition of 'servants' more accurate and appropriate to her argument than the original term 'slaves'? This can be evaluated by considering the context and purpose of her thesis and how well the revised term aligns with her intended message.

User Christian Kienle
by
7.5k points