Final answer:
The author describes the public's reaction to the Supreme Court ruling on corporate campaign contributions as misguided, due to a lack of understanding about the case and its implications.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author's use of the word unfounded in the statement "Much of this outrage is unfounded because many people dont understand what this ruling means" indicates that they believe people's reactions to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling are misguided.
The author thinks the public outrage is based on a lack of understanding regarding the implications of the ruling that corporations have campaign rights, which concerns the First Amendment's allowance of unlimited political campaign contributions by corporations. The ruling, decided with a 5-4 majority, strikes down spending limits as unconstitutional and has profoundly influenced political campaign financing.