The valid argument forms and steps above, we deduce the conclusion Δt from the given premises.
Let's use the given premises to deduce the conclusion ∆t. We'll use valid argument forms to justify each step:
p∨q (Premise)
Reason: Given premise.
q→r (Premise)
Reason: Given premise.
∼r (Premise)
Reason: Given premise.
(∼q→u)∧(∼q→s) (Premise)
Reason: Given premise, and applying the equivalence
P→Q≡∼P∨Q.
∼q→u (Simplification from 4)
Reason: Simplification.
∼q→s (Simplification from 4)
Reason: Simplification.
∼q (Modus Tollens: 2, 3)
Reason: Modus Tollens on premises 2 and 3.
u (Modus Ponens: 5, 7)
Reason: Modus Ponens on premises 5 and 7.
s (Modus Ponens: 6, 7)
Reason: Modus Ponens on premises 6 and 7.
p (Disjunctive Syllogism: 1, 7)
Reason: Disjunctive Syllogism on premises 1 and 7.
p∧s (Conjunction: 10, 9)
Reason: Conjunction on premises 10 and 9.
t (Modus Ponens: 11, 3)
Reason: Modus Ponens on premises 11 and 3.
Δt (Conjunction: 12, 8)
Reason: Conjunction on premises 12 and 8.
Therefore, using the valid argument forms and steps above, we deduce the conclusion Δt from the given premises.