Final answer:
The question asks about the differences between TCP Tahoe and TCP Reno, specifically regarding their response to packet loss in a network.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the behavior of two versions of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), namely TCP Tahoe and TCP Reno, in the context of network communications. TCP Tahoe is an early version of TCP that includes basic congestion control mechanisms like slow start, congestion avoidance, and fast retransmit, but it lacks the fast recovery feature. On the other hand, TCP Reno implements fast recovery on top of the features included in TCP Tahoe, which allows it to recover more quickly from packet loss without reducing the congestion window as drastically as TCP Tahoe does after detecting a loss event.
In a scenario where both TCP Tahoe and TCP Reno transmissions are occurring in parallel, you would expect to see different behaviors in how each protocol responds to packet loss. Specifically, after detecting packet loss via duplicate acknowledgments, while both would perform a fast retransmit, TCP Reno would then enter into a fast recovery phase, where it inflates the congestion window and continues transmitting. In contrast, TCP Tahoe would instead start the whole congestion avoidance process over from slow start, leading to a potentially more significant reduction in its sending rate.