Final answer:
Output does not typically require a contingency plan since it is the result or end product of executing a foreign policy plan. It contrasts with the other options, which are specific actions . option B is correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking which of the following is not an example of a sharply focused foreign policy output. Among the options provided, the one that would not typically require a contingency plan is "Output" as it is more of a result or end product of executing a foreign policy plan and does not directly pertain to planning or strategy.Answer: B. Output
A contingency plan is a proactive strategy that outlines actions an organization would take in response to unexpected events or situations that could impact operations. Presidential summits, military uses of force, emergency spending measures, and international agreements are all specific, deliberate actions or events within foreign policy where contingency plans would often be necessary.
Presidential summits often require detailed planning and backup strategies due to the political and diplomatic significance attached to these events. Military uses of force necessitate contingency plans to address potential escalation, retaliation, or mission failure. Emergency spending measures might require contingency planning to manage the implications of sudden financial requirements, while international agreements involve negotiations that could take unexpected turns, hence the necessity for contingency plans.
In contrast, "Output" reflects the consequences or end-points of these actions and plans but is not a foreign policy action itself that would require a contingency plan.