Final answer:
Critics of international trade development argue it overlooks worker rights except for barring women from certain industries; instead, it is criticized for poor working conditions and labor practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
Critics argue that the international trade development approach often neglects worker rights, presenting several points to support their view. However, the claim that women are not allowed to take jobs in industries such as textiles, food processing, or farming is not one of the criticisms made against international trade development. In reality, many women worldwide work in these sectors, albeit sometimes under labor conditions that are not ideal. Critics focus on issues such as minimal oversight of working conditions by local governments and international agencies, the enforcement of long working hours with low wages, inadequate compensation for injured or sick workers, and the use of child or forced labor within the workforce.
While international trade has been credited with increasing productivity and raising the average wage level globally, the distribution of these benefits is uneven, which leads to a complex situation where high-income countries may scrutinize the labor conditions of low-income countries while not always leading by example in labor standards themselves.