Question

What would be considered a reason for an exception to a worker's right to privacy?

O when illegal activity is suspected

O when there is a possibility of extensive unproductive time on the part of the employee

O when employees are told their personal cell phone activity will be monitored

O when there is suspected drug use which resulted in an accident

Answer 1

A worker's right to privacy can be reasonably excepted in situations where there is suspected illegal activity, particularly when such activity has resulted in safety concerns like an accident. This balances individual privacy rights with the need for safety and conformity with the law.

Step-by-step explanation:

An exception to a worker's right to privacy that would be considered reasonable is when there is suspected illegal activity, such as when drug use results in an accident. This is because the need to ensure a safe working environment and address potential legal violations can override an individual's right to privacy in certain situations.

While workers have the right to privacy, there are circumstances where this right may be limited to protect safety, security, and adherence to the law. Privacy exceptions often involve considerations of national security, workplace safety, prevention of illegal activities, and even broader public interests. For instance, security concerns may lead to surveillance or monitoring of communications.

National security concerns are frequently cited by governments to justify the intrusion into personal privacy. The balance between protecting civil liberties, including privacy, and ensuring safety often proves to be a challenging and contentious issue in law and public policy discussions, particularly in the contexts of technological surveillance and emergency responses to crimes or accidents.