Final answer:
Kya's experiment will likely indicate that obedience to authority figures can compel participants to act against their moral judgment, but the proximity of the 'teacher' to the 'learner' may decrease obedience levels compared to the Milgram Experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The learner's requests to stop:
Kya is likely to find that a significant percentage of participants, acting as 'teachers', will continue to administer shocks to the 'learner' despite the learner's requests to stop, as directed by the authority figure (Kya) present. This follows the findings of the classic Milgram Experiment, which demonstrated a high level of obedience to authority even when such obedience involves performing actions that conflict with personal conscience.
Therefore, in Kya's experiment where the 'teacher' and 'learner' are in the same room, the obedience to continue with shocks may decrease compared to Milgram's original setup. Kya may also find that the participants experience significant emotional distress as they grapple with their personal conscience and the experimenter's directives.