197k views
3 votes
Some have suggested that if the subservient black and indigenous figures were simply removed it might be okay to keep the statue of ... group of answer choices

O george washington
O president roosevelt
O andrew jackson
O abraham lincoln

User Alon Mahl
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The statue under scrutiny is that of President Roosevelt, and critics have proposed removing the subservient Black and Indigenous figures to resolve the controversy about its representation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statue in discussion is that of President Roosevelt. Some critics have considered removing the Subservient Black and Indigenous figures to ameliorate the controversy around the statue.This statue was unveiled in 1940 in front of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. It features President Roosevelt on horseback with an African person and an Indigenous person standing beside him. The statue was meant to symbolize the journey of discovery and learning across continents. The statue in question is a statue of Theodore Roosevelt. It was placed in front of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City and depicts Roosevelt on horseback with an African person on one side and an Indigenous person on the other.

The statue was intended as an allegory of discovery and learning, but over time, its meaning has changed and it has been criticized for depicting Black people and Native Americans as subordinate.However, the positioning of the figures has come under scrutiny for implying a hierarchical relationship, with the white figure on the horse and the Black and Indigenous figures at the side, suggesting a lesser status, reflecting the criticism that the statue depicts these individuals as subordinate or culturally inferior.The suggestion to keep the statue but remove the figures perceived as subservient is an attempt to address these concerns without completely removing the commemoration of Roosevelt's contributions.

User Bytech
by
7.7k points