Final answer:
The statement that incrementalism in government counteracts rationality is likely false, as it can aid in achieving stability and consensus in policymaking. Additionally, the market revolution did bring many social and economic changes to the United States, altering the nation in various fundamental ways.
Step-by-step explanation:
Social and economic change:
The assertion that a factor working against rationality is the fact that government tends to work incrementally is not entirely accurate, as incrementalism can indeed be a rational and effective strategy for government action. Government policies often require multiple actors and branches to carry out, and the incremental approach allows for adjustments and compromises that can lead to greater consensus and stability. Furthermore, this method can help prevent drastic changes that might lead to unintended consequences.
On the other hand, in some instances, like those involving special interests or those with lower voting power, the government might fail to make economically sensible choices or act in the public’s best interest. True. The market revolution indeed brought about significant social and economic changes to the United States. This period, characterized by advances in transportation and communication, the growth of industry, and the expansion of markets, altered the landscape of the nation, influencing the way Americans lived and worked.