Final answer:
Cyber deviants justify their activities by arguing that the harm is limited to computers and that they ultimately provide a security service by exposing vulnerabilities.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Donn Parker, cyber deviants justify their actions by arguing that the harm they do is limited to computers (a). This is a nuanced issue where the perception of harm and the ethical justifications for cyber actions can vary widely. Cyber deviants, including hackers, may rationalize their behaviors by believing they are exposing vulnerabilities and ultimately providing an important security service (c). They might see themselves as part of a broader conversation about the balance between individual privacy and government regulation or protection of the community.
These justifications exist in the context where cybercrimes can have serious implications, from stealing sensitive information to disrupting essential services. The debate extends to the perception of victimless crimes and the potential for even seemingly harmless actions to have broader societal implications. Furthermore, the weaponization of cyberspace by governments and groups exacerbates the tension between cybersecurity and privacy, with various actors attempting to rationalize their invasions of digital spaces under different guises.