Final answer:
Filip's decision to play in the tennis match for the chance of a promotion and a raise illustrates extrinsic motivation, influenced by potential external rewards.
Step-by-step explanation:
Filip is driven by extrinsic motivation. In the given scenario, Filip agrees to partake in a tennis match, not because he enjoys sports, but because he wants to impress his manager and enhance his chances for a promotion and a big raise. This behavior is governed by external rewards rather than internal drives. Extrinsic motivation refers to actions taken due to external factors or incentives, like rewards or recognition from others, as opposed to intrinsic motivation, which comes from within as a result of personal satisfaction or enjoyment in the task itself.
Filip's decision is a prime example of how extrinsic motivators, such as monetary incentives and career advancement, can influence our choices and behaviors. His participation in the match is not due to a love for tennis (as he dislikes sports) or a personal quest for growth in athletic skills (self-actualization or the need for mastery), and it certainly does not stem from a desire for more autonomy or independence. Instead, he is propelled by the potential external benefits his participation may bring, aligning his actions closely with the concept of extrinsic motivation as defined in psychological and motivational theories.