Final answer:
Blind auditions in orchestras likely resulted in better orchestras, as they minimize gender bias and allow for a selection process based purely on musical talent and merit, which can contribute to improved overall quality. option a is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the effects of blind auditions in U.S. orchestras, specifically on gender representation, and what likely outcome, beside greater gender equality, has resulted from this practice. The introduction of blind auditions in the 1970s led to a significant increase in the percentage of women in top orchestras, from less than 5% to over 30%.
The use of screens to conceal the identity of performers during auditions has minimized gender bias, allowing for a more equitable selection process based solely on musical talent. One likely outcome, apart from promoting greater gender equality, is improved orchestra quality,
Answer option (a) 'better orchestras' is the most plausible result of the increase in impartiality during auditions. With the focus shifting to the musicians' abilities rather than their gender, orchestras are more likely to consist of the most skilled musicians available, regardless of their sex. This purely merit-based selection supports the idea that the overall quality of orchestras has likely improved due to the adoption of blind auditions. Moreover, this method aligns with the principle that selecting individuals based on talent and qualification, rather than demographic markers, enhances an institution's ability to compete and succeed.