158k views
5 votes
The claim is the proportion of drowning deaths of children attributable to beaches is more than 0.25, and the sample statistics include n=696 drowning deaths of children with 30% of them attributable to beaches

User Leeoniya
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The question is about hypothesis testing in statistics, specifically to verify a claim about the proportion of drowning deaths of children at beaches. The p-value is much smaller than the significance level, suggesting strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student is working on a hypothesis testing problem in statistics, which falls under the subject of Mathematics at a College level. Specifically, they are testing the claim that the proportion of drowning deaths of children that are attributable to beaches is more than 0.25. The sample statistics mentioned include n=696 drowning deaths of children, with 30% of these deaths attributable to beaches.

In hypothesis testing, we use a test statistic to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. The p-value, which the student says is 0.0022, is compared with the level of significance to make this decision. Since the p-value is less than the 1 percent level of significance, the appropriate conclusion would be that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of drowning deaths is indeed more than 0.25

User Yasarui
by
8.2k points