Final answer:
The term 'Ormee' appears to be a misinterpretation; however, historical events such as the threat posed by the Amorites to the Third Dynasty of Ur and the altered relationships between the Byzantines and Arab tribes showcase how significant problems arise from a combination of factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The event that made the Ormee a significant problem seems to stem from a misinterpretation or typographical error. As no historical event known as the 'Ormee' is widely recognized, it appears the question may be referring to other historical groups or events described in the provided reference texts, such as the Amorites or the relationships between the Byzantines and the Arabs.
One significant event reinforcing the threat posed by the Amorites was the failure of the massive defensive wall built by Shu-Sin around 2034 BCE. The Amorites, a nomadic people from the desert regions of Syria, alongside the Elamites and other groups, posed a substantial threat to the Third Dynasty of Ur. The defensive strategy to keep them out ultimately failed, and their invasive actions contributed to the disintegration of this Sumerian dynasty.
Another problem arose when the Byzantine Empire altered its relationships with tribes such as the Ghassanids in the aftermath of the conflict around 630-631. These tribes received allowances from the Byzantine emperors for guarding desert pathways, but the disturbance in this arrangement—partially due to the Byzantine Empire's internal decisions—could have led to further tensions and problems in the region.
The context of these events, both with the Amorites and in the later Byzantine-Arab relations, can be rooted in larger geopolitical changes and personal historical moments, illustrating that a combination of factors leads to significant historical outcomes.