Final answer:
The differences between Problem-Solving and Standard Protocol models of RTI are mainly observed at Tier 2 and Tier 3, where interventions become more specialized. The Problem-Solving model is customized to the student's needs, while the Standard Protocol model applies the same research-based interventions to all students who need extra support.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, the differences between the Problem-Solving and Standard Protocol are typically noted at Tier 2 and Tier 3, which involve more targeted and intensive interventions beyond the universal supports in Tier 1. The Problem-Solving Model is more individualized; it involves assessing the specific needs of a student and then designing interventions targeted to address those individual needs. Conversely, the Standard Protocol model applies a standard set of interventions to all students who are not making adequate progress in the general curriculum. This can include specific reading programs or prescribed behavior strategies that are research-based and have been proven effective for most students.
These approaches are indicative of the RTI model's adaptability and its commitment to providing the necessary support for students to succeed academically. The RTI framework is designed to identify and help students before they fall significantly behind and utilizes data to guide instructional decisions. Therefore, it's critical for educators to understand the methodology and implementation of both the Problem-Solving and Standard Protocol models within the RTI framework to effectively support all learners.