Final answer:
In a 2011 survey, one-fifth of IT executives identified that large-scale data breaches had made business continuity planning a much higher priority. Studies like that of Bruno & Abrahão (2012) on decision-making in security centers, and national preparedness documents, emphasize the importance of readiness and robust response plans in IT and beyond.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a 2011 survey of 400 IT executives, one-fifth indicated that large-scale data breaches and other security incidents had made business continuity planning a much higher priority in recent years. The increasing reliance on technology and the high costs of disruptions due to security breaches, such as those experienced by Target and other major companies,
have highlighted the importance of robust business continuity and disaster recovery plans. These plans are essential to ensure that organizations can continue to operate and recover quickly in the event of a security breach, natural disaster, or other emergency situations.
Such incidents underscore the necessity for businesses to invest in infrastructure and human factors that can prevent, detect, and respond to threats promptly. An example of research in this area is the study by Bruno & Abrahão (2012), which examined decision-making within a banking institution's information security center.
The study found that increased cognitive demands led to more errors in identifying threats, but not an increase in missed real intrusions, which are costlier for businesses.
Another supporting piece of evidence comes from the U.S. National Security Council's (NSC) Playbook for Early Response to High-Consequence Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and Biological Incidents. This document details strategies for handling such incidents,
although, notably, it was not adopted by the Trump administration, leading to concerns about pandemic readiness raised by experts such as Luciana Borio from the NSC. The impact of unpreparedness was further highlighted by funding cuts to public health initiatives, which left critical positions unfilled and no senior officials with public health experience in the White House.