Final answer:
Objective metrics are more desirable than subjective metrics. Subjective metrics are based on personal opinions, feelings, or experiences, whereas objective metrics are based on measurable and verifiable data.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here are a few reasons why objective metrics are preferred:
- 1. Accuracy: Objective metrics provide a more accurate and reliable measurement of a particular attribute or performance. They are based on concrete data that can be measured and analyzed, leaving less room for bias or interpretation.
- 2. Consistency: Objective metrics allow for consistency in evaluating performance or progress over time. Since they are based on measurable data, they can be applied consistently across different situations or individuals, leading to fair and standardized assessments.
- 3. Comparability: Objective metrics make it easier to compare different entities or situations. By using the same set of objective metrics, it becomes possible to make meaningful comparisons and identify patterns or trends.
- 4. Transparency: Objective metrics are often more transparent than subjective metrics. The data used to determine objective metrics can be made available to others, allowing for scrutiny and validation. This transparency helps build trust and confidence in the measurements.
- 5. Objectivity: Objective metrics strive to be free from personal bias or subjective interpretation. By relying on verifiable data, they minimize the influence of personal opinions, emotions, or experiences.