169k views
3 votes
Spot films taken with conventional cassettes:

1. utilize 100 or more mA
2. Have a better spatial resolution than photospot film
3. Have less quantum mottle than photospot film
4. Are positioned between the patient and the image intensifier
5. all of the above

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The efficiency of capturing visual data in traditional photographic film is low, with only about 1% of light contributing to image formation, leading to more quantum mottle compared to modern CCD devices.

Step-by-step explanation:

When discussing photographic technology and quantum mottle, we are considering the efficiency and quality of the imaging medium used in capturing visual data. Traditional photographic film, which includes silver-based emulsions applied to glass plates or in cassettes, has a certain inefficiency. Roughly only 1% of the incident light makes a chemical change in the film to record an image, the rest of the light is not used.

In contrast, more modern digital imaging techniques, like those employed with a charge-coupled device (CCD), convert light into electronic signals with much higher efficiency. Each pixel in a CCD can detect the intensity of light, resulting in less wasted light and therefore a reduction in quantum mottle compared to photographic film. As technology has advanced, photography has transitioned from using these traditional methods to digital capture, which tends to provide less quantum mottle due to improved light capturing efficiency.

User MattBianco
by
8.6k points