Final answer:
Jason made self-serving and empathy-lacking arguments to Medea in Euripides' play, rationalizing his decision to leave her as politically motivated and beneficial for their family, which are considered as cheesy arguments.
Step-by-step explanation:
The arguments that Jason made to Medea in Greek mythology, specifically in Euripides' play Medea, are typically characterized as self-serving and lacking genuine empathy. Jason attempts to rationalize his decision to leave Medea for another woman by arguing that the marriage will benefit Medea and their children because it would secure them a place in the royal family.
He also tries to justify his actions by claiming that his primary motive for the new marriage was political and not based on a lack of love for Medea. These rationalizations are seen as cheesy arguments because they reduce the profound emotional betrayal Medea feels to a simple practical transaction and fail to acknowledge the depth of her pain and the sacrifices she made for Jason.