Final answer:
The statement that Zimbabwe's government is an example of instability is true. Zimbabwe has faced significant issues such as authoritarian rule, economic struggles, and human rights abuses, causing political instability that affects its citizens' quality of life.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Zimbabwe's government offers an example of government instability is true. After gaining independence from the United Kingdom in 1980 with Robert Mugabe as prime minister, Zimbabwe experienced significant unrest including civil war, authoritarian rule, and economic turmoil. Under Mugabe's 30-year leadership, the nation faced accusations of corruption, election rigging and human rights abuses, all of which contributed to a state of political instability. Furthermore, complications such as hyperinflation, a high HIV/AIDS rate, and reduced life expectancy have compounded the problems faced by Zimbabweans. Although the post-Mugabe era presents opportunities for change, the transition from exploitive colonial rule followed by personal authoritarian rule has entrenched serious economic and socio-political challenges that diminish prospects for stability and prosperity.
Similar challenges have been observed in other nations as well, indicating that political instability is often linked to poverty, social unrest, and poor governance which, in turn, deter foreign investment and hinder economic development. The Central African Republic is another example of a nation with a history of unstable governance, characterized by military coups and civil chaos, further stressing the difficulty of providing reliable public services. These examples underscore the complex relationship between governance, economic development, and social well-being within the context of globalization.