Final answer:
The school violated the student's right of expression in removing them from the general student body, which is protected under the First Amendment. The specific amendment that applies is the First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of speech.
Step-by-step explanation:
The school violated the student's right of expression in removing them from the general student body. This is because the student had a protected right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The specific amendment that applies in this case is the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, including the expression of opinions. However, there are limitations to this right within the school context, such as when the speech disrupts the learning environment or infringes on the rights of others.
In this case, the school likely argued that the student's expression was disruptive to the learning environment, justifying their decision to remove the student. However, the court may have found that the school's actions were not reasonable or proportionate, leading to a violation of the student's rights.