Final answer:
Hanin's model suggests that each individual has a specific optimal level of efficiency, varying by person and by task. The related Yerkes-Dodson Law indicates that the relationship between arousal and performance depends on task complexity, where simple tasks require higher arousal for best performance, and complex tasks require lower arousal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hanin's individualized zones of optimal functioning model suggests that each individual has a specific optimal level of efficiency. This optimal level is not a single arousal level that is best for everyone or for every task. The Yerkes-Dodson Law is related and notes that the relationship between arousal and performance depends on the complexity of the task. For simple tasks, a higher level of arousal can improve performance, while for complex tasks, a lower level of arousal may be beneficial.
An example can be seen in the scenario of a softball team playing in a tournament. If their arousal level is too low due to overconfidence, they might underperform against a seemingly less skilled team. This relates to the general concept that both underarousal (which can lead to boredom and poor performance) and overarousal (which can cause extreme anxiety and hinder performance) are not conducive to peak performance. Instead, optimal arousal is about hitting the right balance, which can vary from person to person and based on the task at hand.
Overall, the Yerkes-Dodson Law and Hanin's model emphasize the importance of finding one's individual zone of optimal functioning for peak performance. This can include managing one's stress levels to avoid both under-stimulation (eustress) and overstimulation (distress), which can negatively impact well-being and performance.