Final answer:
Briggs and O'Brien caution against trusting the testimonies of Bobo, Zinzi, Bolden, or Cruz due to potential testimonial injustice, which may lead to their statements being unfairly discredited by juror biases.
Step-by-step explanation:
Briggs and O'Brien suggest that the jury should not trust the testimony of Bobo, Zinzi, Bolden, or Cruz because their testimonies may suffer from testimonial injustice. This concept implies that their statements are less likely to be believed, possibly due to biases or preconceived notions held by the jurors. For instance, there might be a presumption that women are less credible than men in court. Such a scenario not only leads to unfair treatment but also undermines the integrity of the judicial process. Furthermore, past events underscore the role of evidence in ensuring justice. For instance, testifiers like Abram Colby, who faced retribution for his honesty, underscore the importance of evidence and a fair hearing unaffected by bias.