49.9k views
5 votes
this standard requires that the physician to disclose only what other similarly situated physicians would want to know or what a reasonable physician would tell a pt

User Giga
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

From an ethical standpoint, patient privacy rights and the sexual partner's right to know about the risk of sexually transmitted diseases are both important. Violating HIPAA rules by contacting a sexual partner without the patient's consent is generally not allowed, except in exceptional circumstances. Handling minors' privacy and disclosing information to parents should take into account the laws, regulations, and the minor's maturity and capacity.

Step-by-step explanation:

From an ethical standpoint, the patient's privacy rights and the sexual partner's right to know about the risk of a sexually transmitted disease are both important. However, the answer may depend on the severity of the disease and the specific circumstances. In general, the rules regarding patient privacy are universal and healthcare professionals must adhere to them.

Regarding contacting sexual partners without the patient's consent, it would generally be considered a violation of HIPAA rules unless there are exceptional circumstances, such as when there is a serious danger to the partner's health.

When dealing with minor patients, physicians may face the challenge of balancing their duty to protect the privacy of the adolescent with the potential risk of the infection going untreated. Physicians should consider the laws and regulations of their jurisdiction, as well as the maturity and capacity of the minor, to determine the appropriate course of action.

User AdarshaU
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.