Final answer:
Kolb's model does not merely divide learners into reflective or active types; it outlines four different learning styles (Diverging, Assimilating, Converging, Accommodating) that suggest how people prefer to learn, which is not fully captured by labeling learners as just reflective or active.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Kolb's model divides people into either reflective or active learners is false. David A. Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) is more comprehensive and categorizes learners into four different types based on a four-stage cycle of learning. These types include Diverging (feeling and watching - reflective), Assimilating (watching and thinking - conceptual), Converging (doing and thinking - active), and Accommodating (doing and feeling - hands-on). Each learning style represents a combination of two preferred styles.
For example, someone with a Converging style would have a combination of active experimentation and abstract conceptualization. Kolb emphasizes that people can develop the ability to learn in all four styles, although they might have a strong preference for one.
Applying this to actual learning experiences, like virtual learning and face-to-face learning, student responsibility remains fundamental. Differences in attentiveness can be more pronounced in a virtual environment where the instructor might not be able to gauge a student's participation accurately. Conversely, face-to-face learning allows for more direct observation of student engagement. Understanding one's own learning styles and adapting study strategies accordingly can potentially enhance the learning experience, irrespective of the format.