Final answer:
To start critically reviewing articles for evidence-based practice guidelines, one should first consider the source to assess credibility and reliability. This involves checking the author's credentials, the reputation of the publication, and potential biases in the information presented.
Step-by-step explanation:
When reviewing a number of articles as part of development of Evidence-based practice guidelines, the first step to reading critically should be to Consider the source. This includes evaluating the author's credentials, their expertise, and potential biases. However, prior to deep diving into the content of the articles, it is essential to assess the credibility of the overall source, such as the publishing journal or organization and its reputation in the field. This will help confirm the validity and reliability of the information provided.
Research the author to find out whether they are an impartial expert or known for a particular bias. Conduct a review internally to see if the information in one source supports or contradicts information in other sources. Evaluating Sources means considering diverse aspects, such as author identification, professional expertise, and the presence of biases or peer-reviewed research. Furthermore, investigate the electronic paper trail and take note of differences between various sources to develop critical awareness.