Final answer:
Ancient Greek philosophers are known for their theoretical work rather than applied science, with their approach lacking experimentation. The debate between the merits of basic and applied science is ongoing, with both recognized as important for advancing knowledge and solving practical problems.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question appears to be concerned with whether ancient Greek philosophers did little original research but put science into practical use. While the Greeks did conduct original research, they are particularly noted for their philosophical discussions and theoretical contributions rather than applied science. The approach that they did not have for studying nature was experimental; they were more focused on reasoning and logic rather than empirical evidence.
Regarding the difference between basic science and applied science, the scientific community has debated the value of both. Applied science focuses on finding solutions to practical problems and often uses the knowledge generated through basic science. The history of science shows that this foundational knowledge has led to remarkable practical applications. In summary, while both approaches serve different roles, they are both considered valid and important within the scientific field.