Final answer:
It is generally true that increasing distance from an incident correlates with safety, as it allows for more reaction time to avoid danger. Whether it is safe to cross the road with a car 28 meters away depends on the car's speed and one's ability to cross safely before it reaches them. Assessing safety requires cautious judgment of both distance and speed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'The farther you are from the incident when you notice a problem, the safer you will be' is generally true. If we consider various scenarios such as a chemical spill, a fire, or a road traffic incident, increasing your distance from the situation often correlates with a reduction in potential harm due to less exposure to immediate risks.
Why is this important? Recognizing danger from a distance allows for a timely response, possibly preventing accidents or injuries. For instance, if you see a car driving toward you and it is 28 meters away, whether it is safe to walk across the road depends on the car's speed and your ability to cross safely before it reaches you. Without knowledge of the car's speed, 28 meters, roughly eight car-lengths, could be insufficient if the vehicle were moving fast. It's essential to make judgements based on both distance and speed.
Determining a safe distance to cross depends on variable factors, but as a rule of thumb, more distance allows more reaction time, thereby increasing safety. In the end, vigilance and a cautious approach when assessing safety based on distance are paramount to avoid potential dangers.